How did FDR's court-packing plan challenge perceptions of him as a cautious politician?

The choice indicating that FDR's court-packing plan was seen as a radical effort to redefine checks and balances accurately reflects a pivotal moment in his presidency. The proposal aimed to expand the Supreme Court by adding additional justices for every sitting justice over the age of 70, which many perceived as an attempt to undermine the independence of the judiciary. This action was a significant departure from FDR’s image as a cautious and moderate leader; instead, it revealed him as willing to engage in bold and controversial measures to ensure the success of his New Deal programs.

Critics interpreted the plan as an aggressive challenge to the separation of powers, raising alarms about potential overreach and the erosion of judicial independence. This perception contributed to a debate about the appropriate limits of presidential power and the role of the judiciary in a democratic system. Thus, the court-packing plan demonstrated a willingness to confront established norms and structures, which marked a shift in how FDR was viewed by the public and political opponents alike.